Skip to content

Impact · Chapter 08, 1846–1860

The Seamstress and the Machine

An economic cost rarely written into the history of the machine.

Nine-year-old Jennie Rizzandi helping her parents finish garments at home in a New York tenement.
Nine-year-old Jennie Rizzandi helping her parents finish garments at home in a New York tenement.Lewis Wickes Hine for the National Child Labor Committee, "11:30 A.M. Jennie Rizzandi, 9 year old girl, helping mother and father finish garments in a dilapidated tenement," New York City, January 1913. Public domain.

In 1850, sewing and clothing work was the second-largest paid occupation for free women in the United States, behind domestic service; estimates drawn from Helen Sumner's 1910 federal study count some sixty thousand women in the clothing trades. Needlewomen working at home on piece rates were already among the poorest workers in American cities. The sewing machine did not abolish their work—the expanding ready-made industry still needed tens of thousands of hands—but it reorganized it. Reformers at first urged manufacturers not to adopt the machines; some women bought machines on installment so they could keep sewing at home, and others moved into workshops. As the Smithsonian's history of sweatshops concludes, the machines dramatically raised productivity and lowered the price of clothing without greatly increasing the earnings of the women who ran them. The press celebrated the sewing machine as a liberator of women; the seamstresses themselves rarely appeared in the celebration.

Sources

  1. ScholarshipHistory of Sweatshops: 1820–1880. Smithsonian National Museum of American History.
  2. Government recordHelen L. Sumner. History of Women in Industry in the United States (Report on Condition of Woman and Child Wage-Earners, vol. 9). U.S. Government Printing Office, 1910.
  3. ScholarshipDid the Sewing Machine Bring Liberation or Drudgery?. History Today.

Cite this page (Chicago)